<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Jivaldi Blog &#187; customer service</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.jivaldi.com/tag/customer-service-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.jivaldi.com</link>
	<description>Internet Marketing Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2011 21:07:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com"/><atom:link rel="hub" href="http://superfeedr.com/hubbub"/>		<item>
		<title>The Apple Code: A Look at Apple&#8217;s Retail and Sales Philosophy</title>
		<link>http://blog.jivaldi.com/2011/the-apple-code-a-look-at-apples-retail-and-sales-philosophy/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.jivaldi.com/2011/the-apple-code-a-look-at-apples-retail-and-sales-philosophy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2011 08:42:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Things Web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Customer Service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[creativity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[customer service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sales]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jivaldi.com/?p=670</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://blog.jivaldi.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/appleStore.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-682" title="appleStore" src="http://blog.jivaldi.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/appleStore.jpg" alt="The Apple Retail Store" width="411" height="320" /></a>
<div>&#160;</div>
An extensive report by the Wall Street Journal takes a look behind the scenes of a 117 billion dollar success story - that represents 15% of Apple’s total revenue. The WSJ reveals that a pretty looking store and a good product isn't enough for Apple. True to their modus operandi, Apple takes their stores, sales and their training very seriously. At Jivaldi, we consistently use Apple as a great reference on why design (both product, media, UX..ect)  is extremely important in marketing a product, but we were pleasantly surprised that this attention to detail extends all the way down to the the employees on the floor of Apple stores...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blog.jivaldi.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/appleStore.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-682 colorbox-670" title="appleStore" src="http://blog.jivaldi.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/appleStore.jpg" alt="The Apple Retail Store" width="411" height="320" /></a></p>
<p>Some basic facts to get us started.</p>
<ul>
<li>Apple&#8217;s sales per sq. foot are now $4,406. This is higher than Tiffany&#8217;s and Co.</li>
<li>Employees are supposed help customers, not to sell products. A quote from the training manual:<em>&#8220;Your job is to understand all of your customers&#8217; needs—some of which they may not even realize they have.&#8221;</em></li>
<li>Apple employees are instructed to talk to customers in a very supportive way:<em>&#8220;Listen and limit your responses to simple reassurances that you are doing so. &#8216;Uh-huh&#8217; &#8216;I understand,&#8217; etc.&#8221;</em></li>
<li>Genius Bar employees are trained to say, <em>&#8220;as it turns out&#8221;</em> instead of <em>&#8220;unfortunately,&#8221; </em>to place a  more positive spin on their bad news.</li>
<li>If a customer mispronounces a product name or something else, employees are forbidden from correcting the customer. (hint hint, to all Fry&#8217;s, Best Buy&#8217;s and other places that have ego&#8217;s running rampant)</li>
<li>Employees who are six minutes late three times in six months can be fired.</li>
<li>While Apple employees do not have sales quotas, they are strongly encouraged to sell Apple Care and support.</li>
</ul>
<p>I recently took an iPhone into Apple the other day and they set and &#8216;appointment&#8217; for me one-half hour later. The phone stopped working (my 2 year old decided to use it as either a hammer, or a nail..or both) so I figured that I&#8217;d take it into the store to see if they could do anything. There&#8217;s no happy ending for this phone, but after reading the Wall Street Journal Article, it is true, the guy behind the genius bar somehow spun it in a positive way that I&#8217;d be better off buying a new iPhone than go through the process of fixing the phone. It was probably the nicest rejection I&#8217;ve had since my 6 year old said that she likes hugging my wife more than me because her skin is softer and she doesn&#8217;t have a beard.</p>
<div id="attachment_685" class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 233px"><a href="http://blog.jivaldi.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/apple1stAid.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-685 colorbox-670" title="apple1stAid" src="http://blog.jivaldi.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/apple1stAid-223x300.jpg" alt="Apple first Aid" width="223" height="300" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Scanned photo via Wall Street Journal</p></div>
<p>As it turns out, there is an Acronmym for A.P.P.L.E that store employees are required to learn. Something that we all could learn a little from</p>
<p><strong>(A)</strong> Approach customers with a personalized warm welcome.<br />
<strong>(P)</strong> Probe politely to understand customers needs.<br />
<strong>(P)</strong> Present a solution for the customer to take home today.<br />
<strong>(L)</strong> Listen for and resolve any issues or concerns.<br />
<strong>(E)</strong> End with a fond farewell and an invitation to return.</p>
<p>Simply put, Apple just does things right. And while I&#8217;ve come to expect no less of them, it is also a fact that Apple products are not cheap. In order to maintain the mania of Apple Nation they need to continue to Pimp their products like no other.  I can&#8217;t help but wonder if Microsoft will take the same approach with their <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/presskits/retailstores/" target="_blank">new stores</a>?</p>
<p>(read complimentary article on the <a title="Wall Street Journal Technology" href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702304563104576364071955678908.html" target="_blank">Wall Street Journal &#8211; Technology</a>)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.jivaldi.com/2011/the-apple-code-a-look-at-apples-retail-and-sales-philosophy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Starbucks: an offline study in user experience</title>
		<link>http://blog.jivaldi.com/2010/starbucks-an-offline-study-in-user-experience/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.jivaldi.com/2010/starbucks-an-offline-study-in-user-experience/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 22:11:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Things Web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Customer Service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[User Experience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[agencies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[customer service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[starbucks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[user experience]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jivaldi.com/?p=224</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-226" title="starbucks_offline" src="http://blog.jivaldi.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/starbucks_offline.png" alt="" width="545" height="125" />

Went in for a routine Starbucks purchase today and something occurred to me.  When paying for something at Starbucks the process is made simple.

<ul>
<li>They take my card and swipe it for me (versus pointing to a CC machine in front of the register)</li>
<li>They don't ask the question: "Credit or Debit?"</li>
</ul>

This struck me as interesting and got me to thinking.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So the first thing I realized is that whenever I go into  another store they are always asking the same question &#8211; whether I want to use a CC card or debit. While not a barrier to purchase, this gets a bit annoying after a while because I&#8217;m there to purchase something &#8211; just swipe the darn card will ya?</p>
<p>Yes, I realize that in some cases the store might have to pay for certain transactions and not the other (but this begs the question, &#8216;why ask the question in the first place?&#8217;). There are also consumers that will freak out about typing in their pin # for their debit card and would prefer to validate their identity with the person behind the counter checking their ID.  Still, this strikes me as a great example (albeit a small one) of a non-digital study in <strong>user experience</strong>.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s some random thoughts that come to mind:</p>
<ul>
<li>My guess is that more than 50% of people don&#8217;t care (i.e. &#8216; just swipe the darn card&#8217; mentality)</li>
<li>This question, to me, gets annoying after a while.</li>
<li>The store would be better served by instead asking something customer service oriented. (How&#8217;s your day going?)</li>
<li>People don&#8217;t like to think during a routine purchase.</li>
<li>Neither do consumers  like to fiddle with non-standard buttons, touch pads, little plastic pointers, finger or no finger, green button or &#8216;yes&#8217; button.</li>
<li>By just swiping the customer&#8217;s card and not asking, the store is simplifying the purchase.</li>
<li>At the end of a Starbucks purchase, I&#8217;m relieved that it was so quick and painless.</li>
</ul>
<p>I guess that what I&#8217;m ultimately getting at here is that little things count. And I know that Starbucks spends a LOT of time focusing on these little things. Speaking of which, have a look at Starbucks&#8217; customer-focused idea site: <a href="http://mystarbucksidea.force.com/" target="_blank">mystarbucksidea.force.com</a>. Another small customer-service gem is how they personalize the process of selling a coffee &#8211; where they call you out <span style="text-decoration: underline;">by first name</span> when your drink is ready.</p>
<p>Anyway, I think Starbucks has it right. And I think this applies to all things online or offline. That is, if we don&#8217;t need to ask a question, don&#8217;t. If we don&#8217;t need to add that page or section, don&#8217;t. If we don&#8217;t need to add a graphic&#8230;don&#8217;t.</p>
<p>Just &#8216;swipe the card&#8217; and instead focus on customer service.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.jivaldi.com/2010/starbucks-an-offline-study-in-user-experience/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

